updated task readme
This commit is contained in:
OwusuBlessing
@@ -0,0 +1,309 @@
|
||||
# Custom Vision Transformer for Fine-Grained Classification
|
||||
|
||||
## Business Context & Use Case
|
||||
|
||||
**Scenario**: Build a state-of-the-art computer vision system for automotive industry that requires fine-grained vehicle classification with high accuracy and robustness. The system needs to distinguish between 196 different car models while maintaining performance under various real-world conditions (lighting variations, blur, compression artifacts).
|
||||
|
||||
"Classify these vehicle images with confidence scores, compare performance against pre-trained models, analyze robustness under different noise conditions, and provide detailed performance metrics across different architectural configurations."*
|
||||
|
||||
This requires custom Vision Transformer implementation, extensive experimentation, hyperparameter optimization, and comprehensive performance analysis across multiple evaluation scenarios.
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Architecture Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Infrastructure Setup (Required)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. Dataset Integration - Stanford Cars Dataset
|
||||
**Dataset Details:**
|
||||
- **Training Set**: 8,144 images for model training
|
||||
- **Test Set**: 8,041 images for standard evaluation
|
||||
- **Robustness Test Sets**: 7 corrupted versions (8,041 images each)
|
||||
- Contrast variations
|
||||
- Gaussian noise
|
||||
- Impulse noise
|
||||
- JPEG compression artifacts
|
||||
- Motion blur
|
||||
- Pixelation effects
|
||||
- Spatter corruption
|
||||
- **Classes**: 196 fine-grained car categories
|
||||
- **Task**: Multi-class classification with high inter-class similarity
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from datasets import load_dataset
|
||||
dataset = load_dataset("tanganke/stanford_cars")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. Custom Vision Transformer Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
**Core ViT Components (Must Implement from Scratch)**
|
||||
- **Patch Embedding Layer**: Configurable patch size (8x8, 16x16, 32x32)
|
||||
- **Multi-Head Self-Attention**: Custom attention mechanism with configurable heads
|
||||
- **Transformer Encoder Blocks**: Variable depth with residual connections
|
||||
- **Classification Head**: Configurable hidden dimensions and dropout rates
|
||||
- **Positional Encoding**: Learnable vs fixed positional embeddings
|
||||
|
||||
**Advanced Features (Required)**
|
||||
- **Hierarchical Attention**: Multi-scale feature extraction
|
||||
- **Attention Pooling**: Alternative to CLS token classification
|
||||
- **Layer Normalization**: Pre-norm vs post-norm configurations
|
||||
- **Stochastic Depth**: Random layer dropping during training
|
||||
- **Gradient Checkpointing**: Memory-efficient training
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. Comprehensive Experiment Tracking System
|
||||
|
||||
**Configuration Management**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
@dataclass
|
||||
class ViTConfig:
|
||||
# Architecture parameters
|
||||
image_size: int = 224
|
||||
patch_size: int = 16
|
||||
num_layers: int = 12
|
||||
hidden_dim: int = 768
|
||||
num_heads: int = 12
|
||||
mlp_ratio: float = 4.0
|
||||
|
||||
# Regularization parameters
|
||||
dropout_rate: float = 0.1
|
||||
attention_dropout: float = 0.1
|
||||
stochastic_depth_rate: float = 0.1
|
||||
|
||||
# Training parameters
|
||||
learning_rate: float = 1e-3
|
||||
weight_decay: float = 0.05
|
||||
batch_size: int = 64
|
||||
|
||||
# Optimization parameters
|
||||
optimizer: str = "adamw"
|
||||
scheduler: str = "cosine"
|
||||
warmup_epochs: int = 5
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Implementation Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Custom ViT Implementation
|
||||
- [ ] **Patch Embedding Module**: Convert images to patch tokens
|
||||
- [ ] **Multi-Head Attention**: Custom self-attention implementation
|
||||
- [ ] **Transformer Block**: Encoder block with layer norm and MLP
|
||||
- [ ] **Classification Head**: Final classification layer with dropout
|
||||
- [ ] **Model Assembly**: Complete ViT architecture integration
|
||||
- [ ] **Parameter Initialization**: Xavier/He initialization strategies
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Training Infrastructure (Week 2-3)
|
||||
- [ ] **Custom Training Loop**: Mixed precision, gradient accumulation
|
||||
- [ ] **Data Pipeline**: Efficient data loading with augmentations
|
||||
- [ ] **Loss Functions**: Cross-entropy, label smoothing, focal loss
|
||||
- [ ] **Optimization**: AdamW, SGD, learning rate scheduling
|
||||
- [ ] **Regularization**: Dropout, weight decay, stochastic depth
|
||||
- [ ] **Checkpointing**: Model saving and resuming capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Experiment Framework (Week 3-4)
|
||||
- [ ] **Hyperparameter Sweeps**: Automated configuration testing
|
||||
- [ ] **Metric Tracking**: Accuracy, F1, precision, recall, AUC
|
||||
- [ ] **Visualization**: Training curves, attention maps, confusion matrices
|
||||
- [ ] **Robustness Evaluation**: Performance on corrupted test sets
|
||||
- [ ] **Comparison Framework**: Benchmarking against pre-trained models
|
||||
- [ ] **Statistical Analysis**: Significance testing, confidence intervals
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Advanced Features (Week 4-5)
|
||||
- [ ] **Architecture Variants**: Different ViT configurations
|
||||
- [ ] **Knowledge Distillation**: Teacher-student training
|
||||
- [ ] **Transfer Learning**: Fine-tuning from different pre-trained models
|
||||
- [ ] **Attention Analysis**: Visualization and interpretation
|
||||
- [ ] **Model Compression**: Pruning and quantization techniques
|
||||
- [ ] **Deployment Optimization**: ONNX export and inference optimization
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Python Tech Stack
|
||||
|
||||
import plotly.graph_objects as go
|
||||
from torchvision.utils import make_grid
|
||||
import cv2 # For image processing
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Detailed Deliverables
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Code Structure (Must Be Modular)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
custom_vit/
|
||||
├── README.md # Comprehensive project documentation
|
||||
├── ARCHITECTURE.md # Technical architecture details
|
||||
├── SETUP.md # Installation and setup guide
|
||||
├── requirements.txt # Python dependencies
|
||||
├── configs/ # Configuration files
|
||||
│ ├── base_config.yaml
|
||||
│ ├── small_vit.yaml
|
||||
│ ├── large_vit.yaml
|
||||
│ └── experiment_configs/
|
||||
├── src/
|
||||
│ ├── models/ # Custom ViT implementations
|
||||
│ │ ├── vit.py
|
||||
│ │ ├── attention.py
|
||||
│ │ ├── embeddings.py
|
||||
│ │ └── layers.py
|
||||
│ ├── data/ # Data loading and preprocessing
|
||||
│ │ ├── dataset.py
|
||||
│ │ ├── transforms.py
|
||||
│ │ └── utils.py
|
||||
│ ├── training/ # Training infrastructure
|
||||
│ │ ├── trainer.py
|
||||
│ │ ├── losses.py
|
||||
│ │ ├── optimizers.py
|
||||
│ │ └── schedulers.py
|
||||
│ ├── evaluation/ # Evaluation and metrics
|
||||
│ │ ├── metrics.py
|
||||
│ │ ├── robustness.py
|
||||
│ │ └── visualization.py
|
||||
│ ├── experiments/ # Experiment runners
|
||||
│ │ ├── hyperparameter_sweep.py
|
||||
│ │ ├── ablation_study.py
|
||||
│ │ └── comparison_study.py
|
||||
│ └── utils/ # Utility functions
|
||||
│ ├── logging.py
|
||||
│ ├── checkpointing.py
|
||||
│ └── config.py
|
||||
├── notebooks/ # Analysis and visualization
|
||||
│ ├── data_exploration.ipynb
|
||||
│ ├── model_analysis.ipynb
|
||||
│ ├── attention_visualization.ipynb
|
||||
│ └── results_analysis.ipynb
|
||||
├── experiments/ # Experiment results and configs
|
||||
├── checkpoints/ # Model checkpoints
|
||||
├── logs/ # Training logs
|
||||
└── docs/ # Additional documentation
|
||||
├── model_architecture.md
|
||||
├── experiment_results.md
|
||||
└── performance_analysis.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Documentation Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
#### README.md (Must Include)
|
||||
- Project overview and technical objectives
|
||||
- Quick start guide (< 5 minutes to run first experiment)
|
||||
- Environment setup and GPU requirements
|
||||
- Dataset download and preparation instructions
|
||||
- Example commands for training and evaluation
|
||||
- Results summary with performance comparisons
|
||||
- Architecture overview with diagrams
|
||||
- Hyperparameter configuration guide
|
||||
|
||||
#### ARCHITECTURE.md (Must Include)
|
||||
- Custom ViT implementation details
|
||||
- Mathematical formulations for attention mechanisms
|
||||
- Design decisions and architectural choices
|
||||
- Comparison with standard ViT implementations
|
||||
- Performance optimization techniques
|
||||
- Memory and computational complexity analysis
|
||||
- Extension possibilities and future work
|
||||
|
||||
#### SETUP.md (Must Include)
|
||||
- Step-by-step installation for different environments
|
||||
- CUDA and PyTorch setup instructions
|
||||
- Dataset preparation and verification
|
||||
- Configuration file setup
|
||||
- Troubleshooting common installation issues
|
||||
- Development environment setup
|
||||
- Production deployment considerations
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Visual Documentation (Required)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Model Architecture Diagram
|
||||
- ViT architecture with detailed layer information
|
||||
- Attention mechanism visualization
|
||||
- Data flow through the network
|
||||
- Parameter sharing and connections
|
||||
- Tools: Draw.io, TikZ, or programmatic visualization
|
||||
|
||||
#### Experiment Results Dashboard
|
||||
- Training and validation curves
|
||||
- Hyperparameter sensitivity analysis
|
||||
- Robustness evaluation across corruption types
|
||||
- Attention map visualizations
|
||||
- Confusion matrices and classification reports
|
||||
|
||||
#### Performance Comparison Charts
|
||||
- Accuracy vs model size trade-offs
|
||||
- Training time vs performance analysis
|
||||
- Custom ViT vs pre-trained model comparison
|
||||
- Robustness performance across different corruptions
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Scenarios & Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
### Primary Experiments
|
||||
|
||||
**Experiment 1: Baseline Custom ViT**
|
||||
- Train custom ViT-Base equivalent from scratch
|
||||
- Compare against timm/transformers pre-trained models
|
||||
- Target: >85% accuracy on clean test set
|
||||
|
||||
**Experiment 2: Architecture Ablation Study**
|
||||
- Test different patch sizes (8, 16, 32)
|
||||
- Vary number of layers (6, 12, 24)
|
||||
- Compare attention head configurations (4, 8, 12, 16)
|
||||
- Analyze dropout and regularization effects
|
||||
|
||||
**Experiment 3: Robustness Evaluation**
|
||||
- Evaluate on all 7 corruption types
|
||||
- Compare robustness vs accuracy trade-offs
|
||||
- Implement and test data augmentation strategies
|
||||
|
||||
**Experiment 4: Optimization Study**
|
||||
- Compare optimizers (SGD, Adam, AdamW)
|
||||
- Test learning rate schedules (cosine, linear, exponential)
|
||||
- Analyze batch size effects on performance
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Evaluation Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Implementation
|
||||
- **Custom ViT Quality**: Clean, efficient implementation from scratch
|
||||
- **Training Infrastructure**: Robust training loop with proper error handling
|
||||
- **Configuration System**: Flexible hyperparameter management
|
||||
- **Code Organization**: Modular, well-documented, and maintainable code
|
||||
|
||||
### Experimental Rigor
|
||||
- **Comprehensive Evaluation**: Multiple metrics, statistical significance
|
||||
- **Ablation Studies**: Systematic analysis of architectural components
|
||||
- **Hyperparameter Analysis**: Thorough exploration of parameter space
|
||||
- **Robustness Testing**: Evaluation under adversarial conditions
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance & Innovation
|
||||
- **Model Performance**: Competitive accuracy on standard benchmarks
|
||||
- **Training Efficiency**: Optimized training pipeline and convergence
|
||||
- **Novel Insights**: Original findings about ViT behavior and optimization
|
||||
- **Comparison Quality**: Fair and comprehensive baseline comparisons
|
||||
|
||||
### Documentation & Reproducibility
|
||||
- **Code Documentation**: Clear docstrings, comments, and type hints
|
||||
- **Experiment Documentation**: Detailed methodology and results
|
||||
- **Reproducibility**: Easy setup and consistent results
|
||||
- **Visual Presentation**: Clear plots, diagrams, and result summaries
|
||||
|
||||
## Expected Outcomes & Deliverables
|
||||
|
||||
### Model Checkpoints
|
||||
- Custom ViT models trained with different configurations
|
||||
- Pre-trained baseline models for comparison
|
||||
- Compressed/optimized models for deployment
|
||||
- Attention map visualizations and analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Experiment Reports
|
||||
- Comprehensive performance analysis across all test conditions
|
||||
- Hyperparameter sensitivity analysis with statistical significance
|
||||
- Robustness evaluation with detailed corruption analysis
|
||||
- Comparison study with pre-trained models and architectural variants
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Contributions
|
||||
- Custom ViT implementation with detailed mathematical documentation
|
||||
- Training infrastructure that can be extended to other vision tasks
|
||||
- Comprehensive evaluation framework for fine-grained classification
|
||||
- Insights into ViT behavior on automotive image classification
|
||||
|
||||
### Success Metrics
|
||||
- **Accuracy**: >85% top-1 accuracy on Stanford Cars test set
|
||||
- **Robustness**: <10% accuracy drop under moderate corruptions
|
||||
- **Efficiency**: Competitive training time vs pre-trained alternatives
|
||||
- **Reproducibility**: All experiments reproducible with provided configurations
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user